Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login
 
Technology, Spirituality, Collaboration, Connectivity

Does Verizon get it?

August 17th 2008 17:37
I have been a Verizon customer for a couple years now. I will say the network coverage absolutely rocks. I think Verizon knows this because they do everything in their power to aggravate their customers and force them to switch. There are a couple of reasons that keep rearing their ugly heads for us gadget freaks.

1.Devices
Verizon passed on the opportunity to be the exclusive vendor of the iPhone a couple years ago. Apples demands to make the deal were a bit crazy but still it makes Verizon look bad since the iPhone has been such a buzz since its release. Not to limit this type of stuff to the iPhone, Verizon will also not carry the Blackberry Bold when it is released in a couple weeks. See the pattern? Verizon loves throwing the fact that they have the best network in your face and not carry the best devices that it can. They are always the last to get a phone or they wont get it at all.


2. Charging for services others give away.
Got a GPS in your phone? Sorry, you have to pay Verizon 10 bucks a month to use their proprietary application and you cant use anything else. If the same device is on another network you could fire up Google maps and bam, free GPS. They intentionally cripple the devices they do sell to squeeze more money out of the customer where AT&T leaves the devices open so you can use the features with no extra charge. The next wave of this is called social GPS, this is a service that allows, for instance, your friends on facebook to see where you are based on your phones GPS. There are several FREE services that do this, like Loopt for instance, but NONE of them will work on Verizon for free. Loopt is a pay service on Verizon (4 bucks a month) even though it is free everywhere else.

I wouldn't have such a big problem with this if I had the option to use other programs to access features inherent on the device. The issue for me is I cant use the feature at all unless I pay and then I'm forced to use whatever software Verizon deems is best for me. I know I will get comments from people like "If the calls don't drop then why do you need all this other stuff?"


Because as the cellphone evolves into so much more than a device to talk on I need the providers that control the data running in and out of the device to embrace the technology and nurture it to its potential. I know that sounds sappy but if they don't do that, what we will end up with is half-baked apps and devices that could do much more than the providers are allowing it to.

Can you hear me now Verizon?
23
Vote
Shared on
   


Are XM and Sirius Still Relevant?

July 28th 2008 01:19
When I first got my Sirius radio I thought is was the greatest thing ever. It is definitely better than terrestrial radio for music since they are no commercials, for talk you get less commercials as well but they are still there. Well I have been hearing about the XM/Sirius merger for what seems like forever and had high hopes for it. I had heard Mel Carmison speak to congress about the benefits of the merger and had confidence in his ability to run the show.

I am SO disappointed in the FCC and their inability to come to a quicker decision on this. "It's a monopoly" they keep saying. Do they not realize this is a pay service and that ever other audio medium is a competitor. Things like iTunes, internet radio, regular radio are all competitors of satellite radio. How hard is that to see? Do you listen to it in your car, check. Do you listen to it on the go, check. You see my point.

You would think that this were a merging of 2 nuclear weapons manufacturers. The sad fact, I'm afraid is that satellite radio will probably not boom like they expected. Yes they will hold on to some subscribers for their sports and celebrity niche channels (Stern, Martha Stewart etc.) but as the internet becomes more accessible in cars and portable devices (iPhone) the emergence of internet radio as a real player will surface. I already take my laptop and cellular card with me to listen to several stations I can only listen to on the web. This is allow current regular radio stations to be heard as well as the smaller stations who cannot afford to play in the regular radio space. This will create more content for all to enjoy.

Am I off here? Does anyone see this medium (SatRadio) as something that will thrive in the future and what's your opinion on internet radio as a new thriving medium?

Peace.
38
Vote
Shared on
   


Are you mad at Steve Jobs?

June 10th 2008 22:48
So the World Wide Developers Confernece was yesterday and as expected the new iPhone was announced. Although the new iPhone sounds pretty cool, faster networking, Exchange integration, GPS and a lower price I cant help think that the millions of folks who bought the first round of iPhones have to feel cheated.

I admit, if apple had signed the exclusivity agreement with Verizon I probably would have been in line for one myself. I don't own an iPhone but I have lots of friends who do and I think its a beautiful consumer device that may one day turn into a good business device.

For now I NEED a phone for business that is proven so I have been back and forth between Blackberry and Windows Mobile for years. For my money Blackberry does all it needs to very well while Windows tries to be all things to all people and does a lot of things OK.

So now all those people who paid 4 or 500 bucks for a phone are now seeing a better device come out at a huge price reduction. I must say I would get what I coule for my 1st generation phone and getting in line for the July release. How bout you?

Peace.
59
Vote
Shared on
   


Moderated by Daryl Goard
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]